home email sign-up search
HealthCast Calendar
Daily Reports Health Poll Search
Issue Spotlight
Daily Reports
Daily Health Policy Report
Daily HIV/AIDS Report
Weekly Health Disparities Report
First Edition
Search All Daily Reports Archives
 

Site Search

 

 

 



Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report
  • Printer-Friendly Page
  • Email this Page
  • Share
  • Reprint
Capitol Hill Watch | Veto-Proof Majority Not Expected for House Labor-HHS-Education Bill
[Jul 19, 2007]

      The House on Thursday is expected to approve a $607 billion fiscal year 2008 Labor-HHS-Education spending bill "with broad bipartisan support," although lawmakers predicted that it will not receive a veto-proof majority, CongressDaily reports (Cohn, CongressDaily, 7/19). The House Appropriations Committee on July 11 by voice vote approved the bill, which includes $151.5 billion in discretionary funds, exceeding FY 2007 discretionary spending by $7 billion and topping President Bush's FY 2008 spending request by $10.6 billion.

The House bill would increase spending on health care for the uninsured by 9% above FY 2007 levels and Bush's request for FY 2008. Funding for the uninsured includes a 10% increase in spending for community health centers. The bill also includes $1.1 billion to prepare for a potential avian flu pandemic. Earmarks in the bill total $565 million -- a 50% reduction from earmarked funds in the appropriations bill that was approved two years ago (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 7/12).

Discussing Thursday's expected vote, one Democratic aide said, "I don't know that we're going to get a veto-proof majority on this one." House Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) agreed, saying, "I would expect us to maintain a number that will sustain the president's veto on this bill."

CongressDaily reports that the lack of a veto-proof majority "would be a blow for Democrats," but Democratic lawmakers "also see a silver lining in their potential failure to obtain a veto-proof majority, seeing a campaign issue to use against vulnerable Republicans who vote against the bill" (CongressDaily, 7/19).


...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .....



About Us     Help