home email sign-up search
HealthCast Calendar
Daily Reports Health Poll Search
Issue Spotlight
Daily Reports
Daily Health Policy Report
Daily HIV/AIDS Report
Weekly Health Disparities Report
First Edition
Search All Daily Reports Archives
 

Site Search

 

 

 



Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy
  • Printer-Friendly Page
  • Email this Page
  • Share
  • Reprint
National Politics & Policy | Senate Passes Labor-HHS-Education Bill After Removing Amendments Related to Abstinence Education, Stem Cell Research
[Oct 24, 2007]

      The Senate on Tuesday voted 75-19 to pass a fiscal year 2008 Labor-HHS-Education bill (HR 3043) after removing amendments related to human embryonic stem cell research and abstinence education, CQ Today reports. Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) removed an amendment that would have prohibited federally funded abstinence education programs from using "medically inaccurate" information in their curricula.

In addition, Sens. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) last week in a "conciliatory gesture" removed language that would have expanded human embryonic stem cell research, according to CQ Today (Wayne, CQ Today, 10/23). Federal funding for embryonic stem cell research currently is allowed only for research using embryonic stem cell lines created on or before Aug. 9, 2001, under a policy announced by President Bush on that date. Bush has twice vetoed bills that would have allowed federal funding for research using new embryonic stem cell lines (Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy Report, 10/18).

The House in July voted 276-140 to approve its version of the measure, which would increase funding for HHS' Community-Based Abstinence Education Program and for the Title X family planning program. The bill also would leave in place restrictions on federal funding for abortions and includes an amendment that would prohibit federal funds from being used by states to require human papillomavirus vaccinations for school attendance (Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy Report, 7/20).

The Senate version of the bill would provide $1.9 billion less in discretionary spending than the House version, and the bill now heads to a conference committee to resolve the differences. According to CQ Today, Bush has promised to veto the measure because it contains greater spending levels than he requested (CQ Today, 10/23).

For current women's health policy news, visit the National Partnership for Women & Families' website.


...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .....



About Us     Help