Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report
House Republicans Plan Votes on Several Health Care Bills
Some States Expected To Exhaust Federal SCHIP Funding, Study Says
AP/Long Island Newsday Examines State Legislation on Universal Health Care
Minnesota Lawmakers Agree on Temporary Budget, End Shutdown of State Government
Pennsylvania Budget Reduces Medicaid Services by $240M, Averts Some Previously Proposed Cuts
FDA Orders Warnings About Sudden Blindness for Erectile Dysfunction Medication Labels
United Auto Workers President Questions Need for Health Benefit Concessions to General Motors
Medicaid
Federal Medicaid Commission Named; Former Tennessee Governor To Lead Panel
[Jul 11, 2005]
HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt on Friday announced 13 voting members and 15 nonvoting members of a federal Medicaid commission that will be charged with recommending short- and long-term reforms to the program, the Memphis Commercial Appeal reports. The committee, created as a result of negotiations over the fiscal year 2006 federal budget, will be required to submit two reports. The first, which must be submitted by Sept. 1, will include recommendations on how to reduce Medicaid spending growth by $10 billion over the next five years. The second report, due Dec. 31, 2006, will include recommendations for stabilizing Medicaid over the long term, focusing specifically on "how to expand coverage to more Americans while still being fiscally responsible; ways to provide long-term care to those who need it; a review of eligibility, benefits design and delivery; and improved quality of care, choice and beneficiary satisfaction," Leavitt said (Locker, Memphis Commercial Appeal, 7/9). Members Former Tennessee Gov. Don Sundquist (R), who also served in Congress and now works as a lobbyist and consultant, has been appointed to lead the panel (de la Cruz, Tennessean, 7/9). Angus King, a former independent governor of Maine, was named vice chair (Pear, New York Times, 7/9). Other voting members of the panel include:
- Nancy Atkins, commissioner for the Bureau for Medical Services in the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources;
- Melanie Bella, vice president for policy at the Center for Health Care Strategies;
- Gail Christopher, vice president for health, women and families at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies and director of the Joint Center Health Policy Institute;
- Gwen Gillenwater, director for advocacy and public policy at the National Council on Independent Living;
- Robert Helms, a resident scholar and director of health policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute;
- Kay James, a former director of the Office of Personnel Management;
- Troy Justesen, deputy assistant secretary for the office of special education and rehabilitative services at the Department of Education;
- Tony McCann, secretary of the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene;
- Mike O'Grady, assistant secretary for planning and evaluation at HHS;
- Bill Shiebler, former president of Deutsche Bank; and
- Grace-Marie Turner, president of the Galen Institute (HHS release, 7/8).
Other Members The 15 nonvoting members will provide advice to the voting members (New York Times, 7/9). According to CongressDaily, Leavitt also left open two positions on the commission for governors. Previously, the National Governors Association said it will not participate in the commission because it has offered its own recommendations. HHS noted that governors might participate in the commission when it begins to consider long-term changes after Sept. 1. The commission also likely will include several members of Congress, who will be appointed by party leaders. HHS said in May that eight nonvoting seats on the commission will be reserved for lawmakers. Democrats have said they will not participate in the commission, saying that a nonvoting advisory role is insufficient (Heil, CongressDaily, 7/8). Criticism of Panel According to CQ HealthBeat, the commission makeup was "criticized by most Democrats," who said it is not a bipartisan advisory panel. Rep. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), who proposed the creation of the panel, said, "This is a long way from the bipartisan panel I had envisioned. Any report they produce is likely to be lopsided and therefore not a useful tool for Congress." Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) said the announcement "confirms that the purpose of the commission is to rubber-stamp the administration's failed Medicaid policies." Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said, "[S]ix weeks is not enough time for a commission to develop the thoughtful approach that was intended." Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, said the commission was "a sham that deserves -- and will receive -- no credibility." He added that Leavitt's announcement "reinforces our judgment that this commission is designed to promote pre-determined and very destructive Medicaid changes dictated by the Bush administration." One former Democratic aide said, "My overall reaction is congratulations. I bet I'm the only Democrat in town saying that." However, he added that the commission's recommendations will have only "minimal" impact on lawmakers, who are developing their own Medicaid reform plan (CQ HealthBeat, 7/8). Criticism of Sundquist According to the Times, Sundquist's "view of Medicaid is shaped by his experience with TennCare," Tennessee's Medicaid managed care program (New York Times, 7/9). Tennessee Democrats and patient advocates "blame" Sundquist, who was governor from 1995 to 2003, for many problems currently "plaguing TennCare, which is now undergoing massive downsizing," the Commercial Appeal reports. "TennCare's current struggles are directly related to the eight years of failing to effectively manage the program," Tennessee Sen. Roy Herron (D), said, adding, "During that time, many of us in both parties questioned the mismanagement and proposed changes" (Memphis Commercial Appeal, 7/9). State Sen. Doug Jackson (D), co-chair of the state Legislature's TennCare Oversight Committee, said, "It's the blind leading the blind. I'm in amazement that the White House does not know [Sundquist's] track record on Medicaid issues here, where he demonstrated a very shallow depth of knowledge. He left the TennCare program in a disastrous position. The decisions he made were fundamentally flawed." Michele Johnson, an attorney with the Tennessee Justice Center, said, "To say he was a Medicaid expert would be a stretch. It is startling -- breathtaking -- that he would be in charge of a Medicaid commission." State Sen. Randy McNally (R), said, "I think he was a good administrator, but TennCare -- Medicaid -- is a difficult program to deal with" (Tennessean, 7/9). Reaction Leavitt said, "In Washington and state capitols across America, there is consensus that now is the time to reform and modernize Medicaid. I look forward to having a robust conversation in an open and bipartisan manner with the commission members. Together with Congress and the states, we will create a plan that will better help Medicaid fulfill its commitment to quality care in a way that is financially sustainable" (HHS release, 7/8). Sundquist said, "I'm not in the blame business. We're going to work at solutions and trying to solve the problems" (Memphis Commercial Appeal, 7/9). He added, "We are trying to come together in a bipartisan effort to improve Medicaid, not destroy it" (Pear, New York Times, 7/9). Referring to his tenure as Tennessee governor, Sundquist said that he is particularly proud of his efforts to preserve TennCare coverage for children. HHS spokesperson Christina Pearson said that Sundquist has "dealt with many of the challenges we face on the local level," adding, "We are now facing those on a national level. He's very familiar and has hands-on experience working with the challenges we face. He brings a lot of qualifications that Secretary Leavitt has high respect for." Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) issued a statement praising Sundquist's appointment, saying the former governor "will bring a unique perspective to the challenges facing the Medicaid program broadly" (Tennessean, 7/9). Medicaid Planning Examined In related news, the Times on Saturday examined how many elderly individuals or their relatives are working closely with attorneys to "figure out how to qualify" for Medicaid coverage of nursing home or other long-term care. According to the Times, the rules for qualifying for Medicaid -- created "before anybody anticipated today's exploding nursing home population" -- require potential beneficiaries and their relatives to use a "series of techniques for disposing of assets." Tools include giving money away to meet poverty guidelines or "spousal refusal," in which a spouse refuses financial responsibility for his or her partner to avoid becoming impoverished. But with nursing home care spending reaching $183 billion annually -- half of which is paid by Medicaid -- many of the techniques currently used to shelter assets "are likely to be restricted within a year," as states and the federal government seek to reduce overall Medicaid spending, the Times reports (Gross, New York Times, 7/9).
Capitol Hill Watch
House Republicans Plan Votes on Several Health Care Bills
[Jul 11, 2005]
House Republican leaders this month plan to bring several health care bills to a vote, CQ Today reports. House Republican aides said floor action during the week of July 25 is expected on a bill (HR 525) that would allow small businesses to buy health insurance through business and trade associations. According to CQ Today, action also is expected on a measure sponsored by Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) that would make it easier for insurers to expand sales of health care policies into additional states, and the House also could consider a proposal (HR 1872) to expand health savings accounts for small businesses. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) said that in July he intends to address proposals dealing with health information technology, patient safety and association health plans. A senior Senate aide said a pending "healthy America" bill (S 4) likely would incorporate provisions for association health plans and measures intended to increase competition among health insurers and lower health care premiums. The aide said action on this bill is not likely in July, but added that Frist could push a bill (S 852) that would settle health-related asbestos claims. Another senior Republican aide said that Frist would like to move a proposal (S 1262) he co-sponsored with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) to develop nationwide electronic patient records, but that Frist likely would wait until appropriations bills are passed. Frist also must deal with the likely passage in the Senate of a bill (S 471) that would expand funding for embryonic stem cell research. Frist has been working to secure support for alternate measures that have the support of President Bush and other Republicans who oppose abortion rights. Rep. Phil English (R-Pa.) said, "Many of us wanted to make this the health care Congress," adding, "We must move on health care legislation or there will be major dissatisfaction." House Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) said, "There is strong consensus for action on health care." Republican pollster Q. Whitfield Ayres said Republicans hope that the passage of popular health care bills will increase public interest in the 2003 Medicare law (Ota, CQ Today, 7/8). Bayh Introduces Small Business Tax Credit In related news, Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) has introduced legislation (S 1329) that would provide a health care tax credit to small businesses with as many as 100 employees and allow companies to join purchasing pools to obtain lower insurance rates, CQ HealthBeat reports. The bill would provide a tax credit of as much as 50% to small businesses that currently offer health benefits and includes provisions to encourage other small businesses to begin offering health care benefits. Under the proposal, small businesses would be encouraged to join state-run purchasing pools to increase their bargaining power with insurance companies (CQ HealthBeat, 7/8).
State Watch
Some States Expected To Exhaust Federal SCHIP Funding, Study Says
[Jul 11, 2005]
Federal funds for SCHIP programs likely will fall short of states' needs in coming fiscal years, as more states expand enrollment, according to a report by the Congressional Research Service, the AP/Las Vegas Sun reports. Federal SCHIP funds will total $4.1 billion in fiscal year 2006, but projected demand for funds will be about $5 billion to $6 billion, according to the report. In addition, Congress in FY 2007 is expected to appropriate $5 billion in SCHIP funds, but the projected demand for federal funds will be $5.4 billion to $6.8 billion, the report finds. According to the report, six to 14 states are expected to use their entire federal SCHIP allotment in FY 2006, and 12 to 20 states are expected to use their entire allotment in FY 2007. States must use their entire federal SCHIP budget within three years after it is distributed or else it must be returned to the federal government. So far, a redistribution of unused federal SCHIP funds to states that have exhausted their federal share prevented widespread shortfalls. The report states, "Although the SCHIP program has been successful in covering millions of uninsured children and has therefore been politically popular, some states are poised to exhaust their federal funds as early as next fiscal year. If Congress decides to prevent these shortfalls, legislative action will be needed." Congressional Action Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) on Friday said he plans to introduce legislation that would allot an additional $1 billion to the program. He said the money had previously been allocated to SCHIP, but unused funds reverted to the U.S. Treasury on Sept. 30, 2004. Kennedy said, "It is unconscionable that children will go without health care because funds meant for the SCHIP program were not kept in the program." In addition, some lawmakers would prefer to change the redistribution formula. Still other lawmakers would require states that request additional federal money to fund the program themselves. "Part of the solution might be to make sure the money that's already in the system is directed to where it's needed and will be used," Senate Finance Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said (Freking, AP/Las Vegas Sun, 7/9).
AP/Long Island Newsday Examines State Legislation on Universal Health Care
[Jul 11, 2005]
The AP/Long Island Newsday on Sunday examined how a movement toward universal health care coverage is "being rekindled in some states," amid increasing health care costs and "the lack of political support in Washington for federal changes." A universal health care system with no out-of-pocket expenses could be financed by increased payroll and personal income taxes, which would replace insurance premiums. In addition, states would be allowed to negotiate lower prices for prescription drugs and other health services. According to AP/Newsday, at least 18 state legislatures, including California's, are considering bills that support creating a universal health care system. In addition, supporters of universal health care are seeking to place a measure on the Oregon ballot in 2008. Oregon in 2002 was the last state to vote on a universal health care system. At the time, the medical, insurance and pharmaceutical industries opposed the bill and it was rejected by voters. According to AP/Newsday, voters are "still leery" of universal health care. In response, states are taking "incremental approaches." Maine this year began enrolling residents in a state-private program with the aim of covering 130,000 uninsured state residents by 2009. Some large medical groups, including the American Medical Association, oppose single-payer systems on the grounds that they can stifle development of new medical technology and could create longer waits for patient care. Larry Levitt, a Kaiser Family Foundation vice president, said, "The level of misery with private insurers is rising, and that's why we're seeing this increased activity. But whether one state can succeed, I don't know" (Leingang, AP/Long Island Newsday, 7/10).
Minnesota Lawmakers Agree on Temporary Budget, End Shutdown of State Government
[Jul 11, 2005]
The Minnesota government reopened Saturday after Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R) signed a temporary budget and the state Legislature agreed to an outline of a two-year budget, ending a partial government shutdown that began July 1 when Pawlenty and lawmakers failed to approve a budget (Washington Post, 7/10). The two sides disagreed on Pawlenty's proposal to cut up to 30,000 people from MinnesotaCare, among other provisions. Minnesota, unlike other states, does not have a law that automatically extends spending past the end of a fiscal year if a budget is not approved. About 9,000 state employees were laid off July 1, and services such as highway rest areas and issuance of new drivers' licenses were shut down (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 7/1). Following a 16-hour bargaining session in the governor's office, Pawlenty and legislative leaders announced they had reached an agreement at about 2 a.m. Saturday. The House and Senate then approved the temporary funding measure, and Pawlenty signed it into law shortly before 4 a.m. Following the agreement, state employees began returning to work and suspended services reopened on Saturday. Budget Provision The final budget is not expected to include any cuts to MinnesotaCare, the St. Paul Pioneer Press reports. In addition, a $5,000 cap on outpatient treatment for MinnesotaCare beneficiaries will be repealed. The budget agreement also includes a 15% increase in health and welfare spending over the next two years (Salisbury/Stassen-Berger, St. Paul Pioneer Press, 7/10). Pawlenty -- whose "key objectives" for the budget included controlling health care costs -- initially had proposed a 12% increase in health and welfare spending, but Senate Democrats had favored an increase of more than 19%, the Pioneer Press reports. Pawlenty also made a "major concession" in proposing a 75-cents-a-pack "health care impact fee" on cigarettes -- the only major new source of revenue in the budget -- despite his 2002 campaign promise to not propose any new taxes during his term, according to the Pioneer Press. The cigarette tax is expected to be included in the final budget (Stassen-Berger et al., St. Paul Pioneer Press, 7/9). Pawlenty and lawmakers must approve a final version of the budget by Wednesday night or another shutdown will take effect. However, another shutdown "is considered unlikely," the Post reports (Washington Post, 7/10).
Pennsylvania Budget Reduces Medicaid Services by $240M, Averts Some Previously Proposed Cuts
[Jul 11, 2005]
Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D) on Thursday signed a $24 billion budget that averts "the most serious" Medicaid reductions but still reduces program spending by $240 million, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports (Toland, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 7/8). Rendell and the state Legislature last week reached an "agreement in principle" on the budget that included provisions to reduce by half Medicaid cuts proposed by Rendell during his winter budget address. Rendell said that under the agreement, the Department of Public Welfare will not limit coverage for monthly prescriptions or hospital admissions for women and children and will not implement increases to prescription drug copayments. Rendell in February proposed to limit Medicaid prescription drug coverage to either three or six prescriptions per month and to limit coverage for hospital admissions to three annually (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 7/7). The budget establishes coverage limits for adult Medicaid beneficiaries of 18 physician visits and one rehabilitation-hospital admission annually. It also institutes copayments for middle- and upper-income families with disabled children. Families with an annual income of $40,000 will be required to pay a monthly percentage of their income to cover treatment costs for disabled children (Worden/Uhlman, Philadelphia Inquirer, 7/8).
Prescription Drugs
FDA Orders Warnings About Sudden Blindness for Erectile Dysfunction Medication Labels
[Jul 11, 2005]
FDA officials on Friday ordered that labels for erectile dysfunction medications must include warnings about a potential link with sudden blindness but said that the agency has not confirmed a causal relationship between the treatments and the condition, the AP/Boston Herald reports (AP/Boston Herald, 7/8). In a statement, FDA officials said that certain men -- those who are older than age 50, smoke and have high blood pressure, heart disease or high cholesterol -- have a higher risk for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neurophathy, which is caused by an interruption of blood flow to the nerve that links the eye to the brain. However, FDA officials said that that they could not "determine whether these oral medicines for erectile dysfunction were the cause of the loss of eyesight or whether the problem is related to other factors such as high blood pressure or diabetes or to a combination of these problems" (Kauffman, Washington Post, 7/9). FDA officials also said that patients who take or plan to take ED medications should inform their physicians if they have experienced severe vision loss (Wall Street Journal, 7/11). Reaction Joseph Feczko -- chief medical officer for Pfizer, which manufactures the ED medication Viagra -- said, "There is no evidence that Viagra causes blindness or any other serious ocular condition." Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who has said that an FDA safety officer asked the agency to require warnings about a potential link between ED medications and NAION more than 13 months earlier, said, "It shouldn't take bad publicity to get the FDA to act on the advice of its own scientists and do everything it can to inform and protect the public." He added, "Why did it take more than a year in this case? Did the FDA spend time negotiating label changes with the drug industry and, as a result, withhold vital drug-safety information from millions of patients and their doctors?" (Washington Post, 7/9). NPR's "NPR News" on Saturday reported on the FDA order (Silberner, "NPR News," NPR, 7/9).
The complete segment is available online in RealPlayer.
Health Care Marketplace
United Auto Workers President Questions Need for Health Benefit Concessions to General Motors
[Jul 11, 2005]
United Auto Workers President Ronald Gettelfinger on Friday in an interview with the Washington Post said General Motors officials have not produced evidence that the union must make concessions on health benefits to return the company to profitability (Joyce, Washington Post, 7/9). The GM board reportedly had established an internal deadline of June 30 to reach an agreement with UAW on health benefits, but the deadline passed without a deal. GM spokesperson Edd Snyder said that company officials are "no longer talking about deadlines" but remain "committed to ongoing discussions with the union." GM, which lost $1.1 billion on North American operations in the first quarter of 2005, this year expects to spend $5.6 billion on health benefits for more than one million workers, retirees and family members. Last month, GM CEO and Chair Rick Wagoner announced that the company will eliminate 25,000 hourly manufacturing jobs by 2008 and close an unspecified number of facilities, in part because of health care costs. In recent weeks, Gettelfinger has said that UAW will not reopen the contract with GM, which expires in 2007 (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 6/29). Gettelfinger said on Friday, "We don't know how big of an issue it is at GM until we study it." He said that UAW, with the assistance of actuaries and financial advisers, has begun to examine proposals to reduce waste and improve efficiency within the current contract. He added that UAW considers reductions in health benefits for workers or increases in the share they pay for health care a last resort. In addition, Gettelfinger said that UAW will not reopen the contract with GM as long as the company has about $20 billion in cash reserves. Reaction Stefan Weinmann, a GM spokesperson, said, "We are in discussions, by all means, and we continue to be in discussions." Gary Chaison, a professor of industrial relations at Clark University in Massachusetts, said, "I think there's a tremendous amount of posturing going on, particularly on the part of GM," adding, "But I think at the last moment parties are going to pull back" (Washington Post, 7/9).
Looking for a Daily Report on a specific date? Click here for instructions on how to find it.
...... ...... ...... ...... ......
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
...... .....
|