home email sign-up search
HealthCast Calendar
Daily Reports Health Poll Search
Issue Spotlight
Daily Reports
Daily Health Policy Report
  Calendar
  Recent Reports
  Search these Archives
Daily HIV/AIDS Report
Weekly Health Disparities Report
First Edition
Email Alert Sign-Up
Editorial Policies
Search All Daily Reports Archives
 

Site Search

 



Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report


Friday, January 09, 2004

Health Care Marketplace

   U.S. Health Spending Grew 9.3% in 2002 Over 2001, Marking Sixth-Straight Year of Increases, Study Says

   Group of HealthSouth Investors Files Suit Against Auditors, Investment Bank

Prescription Drugs

   UPS, FedEx Respond to Lawmaker Concerns Over Reimportation

   Boston-Based Prescription Access Litigation Files Suit Against Purdue Pharma Over Alleged Illegal OxyContin Sales

   Ohio Gov. Taft Signs Bill To Create Prescription Drug Discount Program

Medicaid

   Rite Aid Officials Criticize Dispensing Fee Cut Proposed for Maine's Medicaid Program

   Georgia Health Official Requests Midyear Allocation of $172.8M To Pay Medicaid Claims

State Watch

   Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report Examines Developments Related to Medical Malpractice Insurance in Three States

Coverage & Access

   Number of Younger People With Disabilities Has Increased; Rising Rates of Obesity Might Be Factor, Report Says

   WSJ Examines State and Local Efforts To Provide Health Coverage To Uninsured

   Residents in Lower-Income Areas of Chicago Report More Health Problems, Survey Says

Opinion

   State Health Program Budget Cuts Could Have 'Tragic' Effects, Columnist Says




Health Care Marketplace
 

    U.S. Health Spending Grew 9.3% in 2002 Over 2001, Marking Sixth-Straight Year of Increases, Study Says
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      Driven by hospital and prescription drug costs, health care spending in the United States increased 9.3% to $1.55 trillion in 2002, the largest increase in 11 years and the fourth year in a row that the rate of increase surpassed growth in the rest of the economy, according to new data from CMS that is published in the current issue of Health Affairs, the New York Times reports (Pear, New York Times, 1/9). In 2001, health care spending increased 8.5% over 2000, the Washington Post reports (Brown, Washington Post, 1/9). Health care spending in 2002 accounted for 14.9% of gross domestic product, up from 14.1% in 2001 and 13.3% in 2000, according to the data (New York Times, 1/9). Overall health care spending in 2002 amounted to $5,440 per person, an increase of 8.3% from $5,021 per person in 2001, the Wall Street Journal reports (Schaefer Munoz, Wall Street Journal, 1/9). Hospital spending, up 9.5% from 2001, was the largest driver of the health spending increase in 2002, USA Today reports (Appleby, USA Today, 1/9). Hospital spending totaled $486.5 billion in 2002 and accounted for 32% of the overall health care spending increase, the data says (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). According to the report, the hospital spending increase was caused by increasing demand for hospital services, a rising number of admissions, length of hospital stays, medical malpractice insurance costs and hospital employees' wages and benefits (New York Times, 1/9). In addition, hospitals were better able to negotiate higher reimbursement rates with insurers because of mergers, the Journal reports.

Prescription Drug Spending
Prescription drug spending rose 15.3% to $162.4 billion in 2002, accounting for 16% of the overall health care spending increase (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). However, the pace of drug spending slowed in 2002. In 2001, drug spending increased 15.9%, compared with 16.4% and 19.7% increases in 2000 and 1999, respectively. Cynthia Smith, an economist for CMS, said that the increase in drug spending is because of people using newer, more expensive medications and not because of a price increase for existing drugs. She added that the rate of drug spending has slowed because of higher copayments, increased use of generic drugs and prior authorization policies (New York Times, 1/9). According to the data, further rapid growth in health care spending without strong economic growth "threatens the affordability and generosity of [employer-]sponsored health care benefits," USA Today reports (USA Today, 1/9).

Other Study Findings
The government also reported that total out-of-pocket spending by consumers rose 6% to $212.5 billion in 2002, the Boston Globe reports (Kowalczyk, Boston Globe, 1/9). The increase is in part because of a 14.4% increase in out-of-pocket drug spending to $48.6 billion, up from a 10.9% increase in 2001 (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). According to the data, further increases in consumers' out-of-pocket costs could slow the rate of growth in health care spending because "[a]s consumers share more of the increases in cost, the value of health services will be more closely weighed against other purchases" (Sherman, AP/Idaho Statesman, 1/9). Medicaid costs increased 11.7% to $249 billion in 2002 because of a weak labor market and a small increase in the number of older, disabled beneficiaries who require more expensive care, according to CMS (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). Further, the cost of Medicare increased 8.4% to $267 billion in 2002, the Hartford Courant reports. The increase is 2.5 percentage points less than the rate of private insurance cost growth, but researchers said that the difference is because Medicare does not currently have a prescription drug benefit (MacDonald, Hartford Courant, 1/9). Together, Medicaid and Medicare accounted for about 33% of overall health care spending in 2002, the Journal reports (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). In addition, enrollment in employer-sponsored health plans fell by about 1%, the second consecutive year of enrollment decline. USA Today reports that researchers said the decline is because of unemployment and a shift by workers to smaller companies, which are less likely to offer health benefits and require higher employee contributions (USA Today, 1/9).

Reaction
Uwe Reinhardt, a health economist at Princeton University, said, "The increase in health spending is no surprise whatsoever. This is what the American people asked for when they abolished managed care" (New York Times, 1/9). Drew Altman, president and CEO of the Kaiser Family Foundation, said, "Nobody has any idea what the new paradigm is going to be" to keep health care growth rates down (Washington Post, 1/9). Joseph Newhouse, a professor at the Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard Medical School, added, "The one thing we can say is the savings we had from managed care in the mid-1990s is a thing of the past." (Boston Globe, 1/9). However, Newhouse said, "There is a tendency to regard any increase in spending as bad, but to the degree that it buys services that we want to have and improves peoples' health, then it's a good thing" (Heldt Powell, Boston Herald, 1/9). Study coauthor Katharine Levit, director of the National Health Statistics Group at CMS, said, "This continued acceleration injects pressure into the health care system, and everyone -- from businesses, to government, to consumers -- is affected" (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). However, she added that factors that drive the growth of health care spending show "signs of dissipating in 2003" because it generally takes two or three years for changes in the economy, such as the 2001 recession, to affect the health care sector (New York Times, 1/9).

OnlineAn abstract of the health cost report published in Health Affairs are available online. An abstract of a second report on prescription drug spending also is available online.
A HealthCast of a briefing to discuss the data is available online at kaisernetwork.org.

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

 

    Group of HealthSouth Investors Files Suit Against Auditors, Investment Bank
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      A group of HealthSouth investors led by the Retirement Systems of Alabama has filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Birmingham, Ala., alleging that the company's investment bankers and auditors "knew that fraud existed at the health care company or that they ignored clear signs of wrongdoing," the Wall Street Journal reports (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). HealthSouth, the nation's largest chain of rehabilitation hospitals, is being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department for allegedly committing $2.7 billion in accounting fraud (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 9/12/03). The suit names investment bank UBS Warburg and accounting firm Ernst & Young LLP as defendants (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). The suit names several other individuals as defendants as well (Morgenson/Abelson, New York Times, 1/9). The plaintiffs seek to recoup billions of dollars invested in the company, alleging that the defendants were "knowing participants" in the fraud. Specifically, the suit alleges that between 1999 and 2002, UBS banker William McGahan had "regular" conversations about the fraud at HealthSouth with a former company executive (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). The discussions addressed such topics as the likelihood of criminal prosecution and the penalties that could result from conviction, according to the Times. The suit also alleges that Ernst & Young knew as early as 1994 that HealthSouth had overstated its earnings (New York Times, 1/9). It states that G. Marcus Neas, then a partner on Ernst & Young's audit of HealthSouth's 1993 financial statements, "turned [his] head" on $27 million in overstated earnings, according to the Journal (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). Charles Perkins, a spokesperson for Ernst & Young, said, "The problems at HealthSouth were the direct result of former management at the company, and Ernst & Young should not be included in the lawsuit." Mark Arena, a UBS spokesperson said, "We believe any claim that UBS had knowledge of the fraud is without merit, and UBS will defend itself vigorously against any such claim" (New York Times, 1/9).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

Prescription Drugs
 

    UPS, FedEx Respond to Lawmaker Concerns Over Reimportation
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      The United Parcel Service and FedEx have informed the House Energy and Commerce Committee that they have responded to the "growing scrutiny" about their roles in the illegal sale of controlled substances and the reimportation of prescription drugs with efforts to "crack down" on online pharmacies that use the companies to deliver medications, the Wall Street Journal reports (Brooks, Wall Street Journal, 1/9). The House committee, as well as the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, last month raised concerns about the role of package carriers and credit card companies in reimportation. FDA officials last month contacted a trade association that represents package carriers and several major credit card companies and individual package carriers to set dates for meetings on the issue. FDA Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs John Taylor said that the agency might ask the companies to inform officials when they find a pattern of frequent or large reimportation shipments. In addition, he said that the FDA might ask the companies for help when the agency independently discovers such patterns (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 12/16).

UPS, FedEX Efforts
According to a letter sent to the House committee last week, UPS officials currently inform law enforcement authorities when they find shipments that contain controlled substances and have made efforts to "discourage" use of company services by online pharmacies that reimport medications. UPS has sent "cease-and-desist" letters to online pharmacies that use company services but do not require customers to have prescriptions and has warned such pharmacies to comply with U.S. law or lose their ability to use company services. FedEx officials have informed lawmakers that the company has increased efforts to find online pharmacies that use the FedEx logo on their Web sites and has "ceased doing business" with several online pharmacies. Both companies, which account for about 75% of air and ground packages shipped in the United States, would not identify the online pharmacies that they have contacted or dropped as customers. A spokesperson for the House committee said that he would not comment on the efforts by UPS and FedEx until the committee receives responses on the issue from Visa and MasterCard, which are expected by Friday. William Hubbard, FDA associate commissioner for policy, said, "This is not intended to be a 'gotcha' on UPS and FedEx. It's more trying to understand what's happening here, what they know and what might be able to do" (Wall Street Journal, 1/9).

San Francisco Reimportation Program
In other reimportation news, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Tuesday approved a bill under which the city would establish a program to reimport lower-cost prescription drugs from Canada for city employees and residents, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. San Francisco Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval, who sponsored the bill, said that the vote "is a major step toward the goal of cheaper prescription drugs. In the absence of responsible actions by the federal government, cities and states need to be creative." San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom will likely sign the legislation. Boston, Springfield, Mass., New Hampshire, Illinois and Minnesota have established similar reimportation programs (Gordon, San Francisco Chronicle, 1/9).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

 

    Boston-Based Prescription Access Litigation Files Suit Against Purdue Pharma Over Alleged Illegal OxyContin Sales
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      The Boston-based consumer advocacy group Prescription Access Litigation on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against Connecticut-based Purdue Pharma over allegations that the company has illegally marketed and sold OxyContin since the pain medication received FDA approval in 1995, the Orlando Sentinel reports. The lawsuit alleges that Purdue Pharma went to "lengths to maintain its monopoly over the drug by suing a generic company to prevent it from putting a less expensive version of OxyContin on the market" (Bloodsworth, Orlando Sentinel, 1/8). The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Connecticut, also alleges that Purdue Pharma misled consumers about the effectiveness of OxyContin. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of the Connecticut Citizen Action Group, asks the court to order Perdue Pharma to reimburse consumers for the cost of the medication (Johnson, New Haven Register, 1/8). PAL filed the lawsuit one day after Judge Sidney Stein of the Federal District Court in Manhattan ruled that Purdue Pharma misled federal officials to obtain patents on OxyContin, a decision that will allow Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings to begin marketing a generic version of the medication. Purdue Pharma filed suit against Endo in 2000 for patent infringement after Endo filed an abbreviated application with the FDA to market Oxycodone Extended-Release tablets (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 1/7). According to the Sentinel, Purdue Pharma could face more lawsuits such as the one filed by PAL because of the decision on Tuesday (Orlando Sentinel, 1/8).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

 

    Ohio Gov. Taft Signs Bill To Create Prescription Drug Discount Program
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      Ohio Gov. Bob Taft (R) last month signed into law a bill that will create Ohio's Best Rx Program, a prescription drug discount plan for low-income and elderly residents, the AP/Akron Beacon Journal reports. Under the program, as many as 1.7 million Ohio residents can receive discounts of up to 40% on prescription drugs. The plan will be open to elderly state residents regardless of income and to uninsured residents whose annual incomes are less than 250% of the federal poverty level, about $22,450 for an individual or $46,000 for a family of four. The law was negotiated by several groups and took effect immediately. Ohio officials are expected to begin accepting applications for the program later this year (AP/Akron Beacon Journal, 1/7).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

Medicaid
 

    Rite Aid Officials Criticize Dispensing Fee Cut Proposed for Maine's Medicaid Program
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      Officials from Rite Aid, the largest pharmacy chain in Maine, said on Tuesday that stores might stop filling prescriptions for beneficiaries of MaineCare, the state's Medicaid program, as well as decrease pharmacy hours and close some facilities if a proposed reimbursement cut is enacted, the Portland Press Herald reports. Gov. John Baldacci (D) has proposed a total of $22 million in cuts to the Medicaid program to lower the state's $108.5 million budget deficit. Those cuts include reducing pharmacists' Medicaid dispensing fees by 40%, from $3.35 to $2 per prescription, according to Trish Riley, director of the governor's Office of Health Policy and Finance. The dispensing fee reduction would result in an estimated $1.3 million in savings for the state, the Press Herald reports. Community Pharmacies, a Maine-owned group of 14 pharmacies, on Tuesday also requested that the governor repeal his proposal. Representatives from Rite Aid, Community Pharmacies and other drug stores are expected to attend a press conference at the statehouse to criticize the proposal. In addition, Rite Aid stores are distributing handouts to encourage customers to protest to the governor and state lawmakers, the Press Herald reports. Rite Aid officials also said that the chain will not take part in Maine Rx Plus, the state's new prescription drug discount plan, which requires that pharmacies provide Maine residents who do not have drug coverage with discounts on their medications. Rite Aid President and CEO Mary Sammons said, "[W]hile we want to keep serving all of our customers, we still have to cover our costs and make a fair profit." However, according to Riley, the dispensing fee cut would likely decrease Rite Aid's Medicaid revenues in Maine by 2%. Jody Cook, a spokesperson for Rite Aid, responded that the percentage would be high enough to close a store. According to the Maine Pharmacy Association, the dispensing fee cut could prompt many state pharmacies to choose not to participate in Maine Rx Plus (Huang/Carrier, Portland Press Herald, 1/7).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

 

    Georgia Health Official Requests Midyear Allocation of $172.8M To Pay Medicaid Claims
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      Georgia will run out of money to pay Medicaid claims to health care providers in March unless the state Legislature approves Gov. Sonny Perdue's (R) request for $172.8 million, the state's Department of Community Health Commissioner Tim Burgess told lawmakers on Tuesday, the Savannah Morning News reports. The funds, which would go in part toward paying providers' claims dating back to 2002, represent the largest increase in Perdue's midyear budget, which is "otherwise packed with spending cuts" to state programs, the Morning News reports (Williams, Savannah Morning News, 1/7). To compensate for an estimated budget shortfall of $500 million to $1 billion, Perdue ordered all state agencies to propose ways to reduce their budgets by 2.5% for the current fiscal year. After reviewing those proposals, on Monday he recommended which cuts should be made, including those that would affect nursing homes and family planning services (Peters, Macon Telegraph, 1/7). Purdue's proposal also would eliminate Medicaid coverage for adult dental care to save the state an estimated $1.3 million. Further, he recommended requiring parents of severely disabled children receiving health care services from a state program to pay premiums based on their incomes, a move that would save the state an estimated $350,000 (Savannah Morning News, 1/7). The governor's budget would provide additional funds for health care coverage for low-income children and $6.3 million in funds to install a new health care claims processing computer system. The General Assembly will debate Perdue's budget once it reconvenes on Monday, and it will submit its own budget proposal in the coming weeks (Macon Telegraph, 1/7).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

State Watch
 

    Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report Examines Developments Related to Medical Malpractice Insurance in Three States
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report highlights recent developments related to medical malpractice insurance in three states. Summaries of the developments appear below.

  • Florida: GE Medical Protective, which provides malpractice insurance coverage to about 5% of physicians in the state, has raised 2004 premium rates by an average of 45%, despite a malpractice law enacted last year, the AP/St. Petersburg Times reports (AP/St. Petersburg Times, 1/2). The law caps noneconomic damages in most malpractice lawsuits and requires malpractice insurers to reduce premium rates after Jan. 1, 2004 based on state cost savings estimates (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 12/5/03). State regulators approved GE's malpractice premium rate increase request because the company has experienced losses that "justified the rate increase," according to state Office of Insurance Regulation spokesperson Lisa Miller. State regulators also have approved a request by First Professionals Insurance, the largest malpractice insurer in the state, to increase 2004 premium rates by 8% (AP/St. Petersburg Times, 1/2). In other malpractice news, the University of Miami Medical School this spring will ask state lawmakers for a cap on damages in malpractice lawsuits against medical school physicians that involve low-income patients at Jackson Memorial Hospital, the Miami Herald reports. The medical school has 700 physicians who work at Jackson Memorial, a public hospital whose physicians benefit from a $200,000 cap on damages in malpractice lawsuits that involve low-income patients, but the cap does not apply to the medical school physicians, according to the Herald. Gov. Jeb Bush (R) supports the request (Weaver, Miami Herald, 12/29/03).

  • Kentucky: State Senate President David Williams (R) on Tuesday proposed an amendment to the state constitution that would cap damages in malpractice lawsuits, the Lexington Herald-Leader reports. In response, officials for Kentucky Watch, a consumer advocacy group that formed in August, said that on each day of the 2004 General Assembly session, the group will distribute to state lawmakers a "new horror story" of alleged malpractice, the Herald-Leader reports. Kentucky Watch Executive Director Jason Baird said, "We want them to always look at every health care issue from a patient perspective." Williams said, "I feel for these people who have been injured. ... They are individuals who need to be compensated for their medical bills, their lost wages, and this bill will not prohibit that from being done." Baird also said that Kentucky Watch will support legislation that would require hospitals to publish their infection rates each month and require physicians to write prescriptions more legibly (Ward, Lexington Herald-Leader, 1/7).

  • Pennsylvania: Gov. Ed Rendell (D) late last month signed into law a bill (HB 44) that will provide discounts on payments for physicians who participate in the state Medical Care Accountability and Reduction of Error fund, which could save some physicians tens of thousands of dollars, the AP/Philadelphia Inquirer reports. MCARE provides $500,000 in malpractice insurance to physicians and other health care professionals in the state. Under the legislation, physicians in the state will receive at least a 50% discount on payments that they make to MCARE for 2003 and 2004. Physicians in specialties with the highest malpractice insurance premium rates, such as obstetricians, neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons, will make no payments to MCARE over the same period. The bill requires physicians who receive the discounts to continue practicing medicine in the state for at least one year after the discounts end (Caruso, AP/Philadelphia Inquirer, 12/30/03). Physicians who violate the requirement will have to make their full payments to MCARE and pay for administrative and legal costs (Hinkelman, Philadelphia Daily News, 1/7). The state will cover the cost of the discounts, which will total about $180 million, with revenue raised by a 35-cent increase in the state cigarette tax (AP/Philadelphia Inquirer, 12/30/03).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

Coverage & Access
 

    Number of Younger People With Disabilities Has Increased; Rising Rates of Obesity Might Be Factor, Report Says
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      Disability rates among U.S. residents in their 30s and 40s increased "dramatically" in the last 20 years, in large part because of increased obesity rates, according to a study published in the January/February issue of Health Affairs, USA Today reports (Hellmich, USA Today, 1/9). In the study, Darius Lakdawalla, an economist at RAND, and colleagues analyzed data from the National Health Interview Survey, which collects information from about 36,000 U.S. households each year (McDonough, AP/Dallas Morning News, 1/8). Survey respondents were considered disabled in cases in which they could not take care of their personal needs or had limited ability to perform routine tasks (USA Today, 1/9). According to the study, between 1984 and 1996, the rate of respondents ages 30 to 39 considered disabled increased by 80%, and the rate among respondents ages 40 to 49 increased by 31% (Winslow, Wall Street Journal, 1/9). The study also found that the rate of respondents ages 18 to 29 and those ages 50 to 59 increased between 1984 and 1996; the rate among respondents ages 60 to 69 decreased by more than 10%, according to the study. The main causes of disability among respondents younger than age 60 were musculoskeletal problems, such as back injuries, and mental illnesses, the study found (Richardson, Los Angeles Times, 1/9). Both problems disproportionately affect obese individuals. According to researchers, the results of the study predict "potentially challenging issues for both employers and policy makers already struggling with skyrocketing health care costs," the Journal reports. Helen Darling, president of the National Business Group on Health, said the results of the study highlight increased concerns among employers about the effect that overweight employees have on health care costs and productivity. In addition, she said that health insurers also may face problems because they rely on healthy employees to limit premium rate increases (Wall Street Journal, 1/9). An abstract of the study is available online.

Disability Council Calls For Improved Statistics
In related news, a National Council on Disability report scheduled for release on Friday warns that a lack of government information on U.S. residents with disabilities has "deprived local officials, schools and businesses of financing they need" to provide them with adequate services, the AP/Philadelphia Inquirer reports. According to the council, accurate information is required because census data are used to allocate federal funds to states, improve civil rights enforcement and predict the number of individuals eligible for Social Security benefits. The report found that the 2000 census failed to account for children younger than age six with disabilities and that the Census Bureau reached two different estimates on the number of U.S. residents with disabilities. The report calls for "drastic changes in the way" that the Census Bureau collects data to ensure adequate funds for disability services, according to the AP/Inquirer (AP/Philadelphia Inquirer, 1/9).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

 

    WSJ Examines State and Local Efforts To Provide Health Coverage To Uninsured
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      The Wall Street Journal on Friday examined state and local efforts to provide health coverage to the uninsured, as political tensions and a "ballooning federal deficit" indicate that the federal government is unlikely to address the issue "anytime soon." State initiatives to expand health coverage include the Dirigo program in Maine, which is designed to provide coverage to residents whose employers don't offer coverage and who are ineligible for Medicaid; Healthy NY in New York state, which is designed to require insurers to offer low-cost health plans; and a new California law (SB 2) that requires some employers to provide health coverage to employees or else pay into a state fund that will be used to provide health coverage, the Journal reports. Other initiatives include "three-share" programs in which employees, employers and local communities share the cost of health plan premiums. For example, Access Health in Muskegon, Mich., uses contributions from employees, employers and the county to contract directly with doctors and hospitals to provide employees with basic and specialty care, according to the Journal. "[S]tates and communities are starting to take things into their own hands," Paul Fronstin, senior research associate at the Employee Benefit Research Institute, said. Some advocates for the uninsured "welcome state and local efforts," but they maintain that only federal action will significantly lower the number of U.S. residents without health insurance. Economic and Social Research Institute President Jack Meyer said, "The states are good crucibles, good learning laboratories, but I don't think they can do this on their own ... there are 43 million uninsured and the states don't have the resources to bring this to scale." Further, states' efforts could be affected by "political and economic pressures," as many states are facing budget deficits that could strain their programs, the Journal reports (McGinley, Wall Street Journal, 1/9).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

 

    Residents in Lower-Income Areas of Chicago Report More Health Problems, Survey Says
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      Children living in predominantly white, middle-class neighborhoods in Chicago reported better health status than children in lower-income, minority neighborhoods, according to a survey released Thursday by Sinai Health System, the Chicago Tribune reports. Researchers surveyed 1,700 households in six neighborhoods between September 2002 and April 2003 about different health factors. Residents of Norwood Park, a mainly white and middle-class area, "overwhelmingly" reported better health than other areas; residents of Humboldt Park and North Lawndale, the lowest-income areas, "almost always" reported the worst health, according to the Tribune. Other findings include:

  • Twenty-eight percent of children younger than age 12 in Humboldt Park and 34% of Puerto Rican children in several neighborhoods have asthma, compared with 15% of children in Norwood Park.
  • Forty-four percent of residents in South Lawndale and 60% of people in Humboldt Park and North Lawndale are uninsured.
  • Two out of three children in all neighborhoods except Norwood Park are obese.

Reaction
The survey, which was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, "confirms vast discrepancies in how diseases are diagnosed or treated from one community to another," according to the Tribune. It recommends more research into local health; investment in preventive care and disease screening; and universal access to care. Steve Whitman, director of the survey, said, "We knew that the disparities were bad, but we were shocked at how bad some were." David Ansell, chair of the Department of Internal Medicine at Mt. Sinai Hospital, said that people living in lower-income neighborhoods could be less healthy because their areas of residence lack fitness facilities and grocery stores with healthier foods. "This is not a problem of individuals who have bad genes. These communities are redlined for ... the kinds of things that would allow for healthier communities," Ansell said (Deering, Chicago Tribune, 1/8).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.

Opinion
 

    State Health Program Budget Cuts Could Have 'Tragic' Effects, Columnist Says
    [Jan 09, 2004]

      Budget deficits have prompted many states to make reductions in their Medicaid and SCHIP programs, and as a result, the United States is "going backward" in efforts to provide the "most fundamental kinds of health care to ordinary people, including children," columnist Bob Herbert writes in a New York Times opinion piece. States face a collective $40 billion to $50 billion budget deficit for the next fiscal year, according to Herbert. He cites a recent study conducted by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities that found that in the past two years, 34 states have implemented "potentially devastating cuts" to social programs, such as Medicaid and SCHIP, to help address budget deficits. States are "cutting vital social programs so deeply that tragic consequences are inevitable," Herbert writes. He adds that a loss of health coverage "frequently leads to reluctance to seek care," and when the uninsured finally obtain health care, their illnesses are expensive to treat and the "financial consequences can be ruinous." Herbert concludes, "Maybe the nation itself needs a doctor. Shoving low-income people, including children, off the health care rolls at a time when the economy is allegedly booming is a sure sign of some kind of sickness in the society" (Herbert, New York Times, 1/9).

Email this story to a friend. Link to this story.
Print this story. Save this story in my saved links.


Looking for a Daily Report on a specific date? Click here for instructions on how to find it. ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .....


About Us     Help